6388-74-5Relevant articles and documents
SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLE COMPOUNDS AS TOLL RECEPTOR INHIBITORS
-
Page/Page column 200-201, (2021/05/07)
Disclosed are compounds of Formula (I) N-oxides, or salts thereof, wherein G, A, R1, and R5 are defined herein. Also disclosed are methods of using such compounds as inhibitors of signaling through Toll-like receptor 7, or 8, or 9, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising such compounds. These compounds are useful in treating inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.
Effect of the Ligand Backbone on the Reactivity and Mechanistic Paradigm of Non-Heme Iron(IV)-Oxo during Olefin Epoxidation
Biswas, Jyoti Prasad,Ansari, Mursaleem,Paik, Aniruddha,Sasmal, Sheuli,Paul, Sabarni,Rana, Sujoy,Rajaraman, Gopalan,Maiti, Debabrata
supporting information, p. 14030 - 14039 (2021/05/11)
The oxygen atom transfer (OAT) reactivity of the non-heme [FeIV(2PyN2Q)(O)]2+ (2) containing the sterically bulky quinoline-pyridine pentadentate ligand (2PyN2Q) has been thoroughly studied with different olefins. The ferryl-oxo complex 2 shows excellent OAT reactivity during epoxidations. The steric encumbrance and electronic effect of the ligand influence the mechanistic shuttle between OAT pathway I and isomerization pathway II (during the reaction stereo pure olefins), resulting in a mixture of cis-trans epoxide products. In contrast, the sterically less hindered and electronically different [FeIV(N4Py)(O)]2+ (1) provides only cis-stilbene epoxide. A Hammett study suggests the role of dominant inductive electronic along with minor resonance effect during electron transfer from olefin to 2 in the rate-limiting step. Additionally, a computational study supports the involvement of stepwise pathways during olefin epoxidation. The ferryl bend due to the bulkier ligand incorporation leads to destabilization of both (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) orbitals, leading to a very small quintet–triplet gap and enhanced reactivity for 2 compared to 1. Thus, the present study unveils the role of steric and electronic effects of the ligand towards mechanistic modification during olefin epoxidation.
Tandem transfer hydrogenation-epoxidation of ketone substrates catalysed by alkene-tethered Ru(ii)-NHC complexes
Malan, Frederick P.,Singleton, Eric,Van Rooyen, Petrus H.,Landman, Marilé
supporting information, p. 8472 - 8481 (2019/06/14)
A series of nine cyclopentadienyl Ru(ii)-NHC complexes (1-9) have been synthesised by systematically varying the ligand and/or ligand substituents: η5-C5H4R′ (R′ = H, Me), EPh3 (E = P, As), NHC (Im, BIm), where NHC = Im(R)(R′) (R, R′ = Me, Bn, 4-NO2Bn, C2H4Ph, C4H7). Each of the Ru(ii)-NHC complexes features an N-alkenyl tether to attain bidentate NHC ligands. All complexes found application as catalysts in the tandem transfer hydrogenation and epoxidation reactions of carbonyl substrates. The catalytic activity of the complexes was shown to be similar, with efficiencies of up to 69% conversion after 18 hours and varying alcohol:epoxide selectivity for a variety of electronically diverse carbonyl substrates. Complex 3, with a nitro-containing substituent on the NHC ligand, was the only complex that showed preference for the alcohol product over the epoxide after 18 hours of reaction time.