Acid Hydrolyses of Benzaldehyde Acetals
SCHEME 4
generating the oxocarbenium ion (Schemes 2 and 3),
because in water with dilute substrate, formation of the
oxocarbenium ion is rate limiting.2 The two stepwise
pathways along the axes from the reactant corner, 1, are
(a) the classical A-1 mechanism of initial protonation
followed by C-O cleavage or (b) initial C-O cleavage
followed by rapid protonation of the alkoxide ion, i.e.,
spontaneous (uncatalyzed) hydrolysis.5
The similarity of ∆∆G° values at corners 2 and 3 for
BMA is probably fortuitous, but it is consistent with the
idea that oxocarbenium formation from BMA and BBA
involves extensive, although not necessarily complete,
proton transfer, consistent with there being no indication
of buffer catalysis of these reactions, and that relatively
modest structural changes could promote the general-
acid pathway. These comparisons indicate a “late” transi-
tion state. The free energy of the protonated acetal,
corner 2, is much higher than that of the reactants,
corner 1, thus the reaction coordinate for hydrolyses of
the primary acetals should be near the right-hand side
of the diagram and the transition state should be between
species at corners 2 and 3 (Figure 7). The absence of
observed general-acid catalysis in hydrolyses of the
primary acetals BMA and BBA is consistent with rate-
limiting cleavage of the protonated substrate,3-5,15 but a
concerted pathway with almost complete proton transfer
in the transition state, i.e., R between 0.8 and 1,15 cannot
be distinguished kinetically. The free energies of activa-
tion, calculated by use of the Eyring equation, are 15.8
and 10.9 kcal‚mol-1 for hydrogen-ion-catalyzed hydroly-
ses of BMA and BTBA, respectively. The value for
hydrolysis of BMA is higher than the estimated free
energies of protonated MBA and the oxocarbenium ion,
as expected for a stepwise reaction. If we assume that
basicities of BMA and BTBA are similar, the free energy
of activation for hydrolysis of BTBA is lower than that
of protonated substrate, consistent with a concerted
reaction, but higher than that of the putative oxocarbe-
nium ion product; i.e., the free energy of activation is
higher than the predicted free energy of the intermediate.
The J encks-More-O’Ferrall diagram is for a methoxy
derivative, and increasing the bulk of the alkoxy groups
should affect free energies of the structures at corners
1-4 to different extents. Relative to the products, corner
3, the free energy of the initial state, corner 1, should
increase because of steric interactions between the alkoxy
and phenyl groups. Increasing the bulk of the alkoxy
groups will also destabilize the species at corner 2 by
steric crowding and steric hindrance to hydration of the
protonated acetal, and also destabilize the oxocarbenium
ion, corner 3, although to a lesser extent because hydra-
tion of the protonated substrate, corner 2, should be
stronger than that of the charge-dispersed oxocarbenium
ion, corner 3. The free energy of the species at corner 4
will be increased to some extent by steric hindrance to
hydration of the alkoxide ion but there should be release
of steric strain in going from an sp3 to an sp2 carbon at
the reaction center. In any event, ∆∆G° at this corner is
much higher than at corners 2 and 3 and uncertainties
in structural effects on the energy at corner 4 should not
affect interpretation of the results.
We estimated the free energies differences, ∆∆G°
values, of hypothetical intermediates at corners 2-4,
relative to the initial state, corner 1, ∆G° ) 0 at the
standard state of 1 M BMA and 1 M hydronium ions at
25 °C from the equation ∆∆G° ) -RT ln K, with R )
0.001 987 kcal K-1 M-1 and T ) 298.15 K (25 °C). ∆∆G°
for protonation of the acetal, corner 1, BMA, to its
conjugate acid, corner 2, is given by the pKa of the
conjugate acid, ca. -7,3,34 and ∆∆G° ≈ 9.5 kcal/mol. The
free energy difference between corner 4 and the oxocar-
benium ion product, corner 3, is given by the pKa of
MeOH, which is 15.5,35 and ∆∆G° (corner 3 to 4) ≈ 9.2
kcal/mol. The free energy difference between the product
corner, 3, and the initial state, corner 1, is more difficult
to estimate because it includes proton transfer and C-O
bond cleavage of an aryl alkyl ether. We made an
estimate from pKR+ for conversions of arylmethyl car-
bocations into ROH and H3O+ (Scheme 4). This hydration
reaction is similar to the transformation of the oxocar-
benium ion and HOR, corner 3, into the acetal and H3O+,
corner 1. Some values of pKR+ are Ph3C+, -6.6; 4-Me-
OC6H4CPh2+, -3.4, (4-MeOC6H4)2CH+, -5.7.36 We as-
sume that for formation of an oxocarbenium ion pKR+ is
ca. -3, i.e., that the electronic release from the two alkoxy
groups is similar to that from two phenyl and one
2-methoxyphenyl groups, and that pKR+ is similar for loss
of HOH (carbocation acidity) and MeOR ()Me) (corners
1 and 3). We include the molarity of water because water
is lost from the protonated alcohol for pKR+, but in acetal
hydrolyses 1 M alcohol is lost from protonated substrate.
Values of pKR+ are estimated in strongly acidic solvents
from 1 to 10 M acid, and the water molarity will be on
the order of 20-55.5 M, which means that pKR+ is more
negative by 3 (ln 20) to 4 (ln 55.5) units. We therefore
assume that pKR+ for hypothetical formation of the acetal
from the oxocarbenium ion and MeOH ca. -7, and the
free energy for formation of oxocarbenium ion from the
acetal is ∆∆G° (corner 1 to 3) ≈ 9.5 kcal/mol at 25 °C.
Finally, ∆∆G° for formation of the oxocarbenium ion and
MeO-, corner 4, is the sum of ∆∆G° values for formation
of intermediates at corner 3 from corner 1 and corner 4
from corner 3, i.e., 9.5 + 9.2, and ∆∆G° (corner 1 to 4) ≈
18.7 kcal/mol. In sum, the approximate ∆∆G° values of
species at corners 2-4 relative to corner 1 are 9.5, 9.5,
and 18.7 kcal/mol, respectively. These ∆∆G° values are
also shown in Figure 7. They indicate, qualitatively, the
relative free energies of the hypothetical intermediates
and are consistent with the transition state not having
extensive oxocarbenium character, i.e., contributions
from corners 3 and 4.
In general, increasing the bulk of the alkoxy groups
increases the energy of the species at corners 1 and 2
relative to 3 and 4 and the transition state moves toward
the initial state along the reaction coordinate (toward
corner 1 from 3) and orthogonal to the diagonal (toward
corner 4 from 2).2 This movement of the transition state
is consistent with a decrease in R as observed for
(34) Bunton, C. A.; DeWolfe, R. H. J . Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 1371-
1375.
(35) Ballinger, P.; Long, F. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 795-
798.
(36) Coetzee, J . F.; Ritchie, C. D. Solute-Solvent Interactions; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1969.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2003 713