PHONOLOGICAL LEXICAL PROCESSING
985
sition, and dyslexia: Insight from connectionist models. Psychologi-
cal Review, 106, 491-528.
Herdman, C. M., LeFevre, J., & Greenham, S. L. (1994). Implicating
the lexicon: Base-word frequency effects in pseudohomophonenam-
ing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Per-
formance, 20, 575-590.
Herdman, C. M., LeFevre, J., & Greenham, S. L. (1996). Base word
frequency and pseudohomophonenaming. Quarterly Journal of Ex-
perimental Psychology, 49A, 1044-1061.
Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial
phoneme versus whole word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evi-
dence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Jour-
nal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory, & Cognition, 24,
862-885.
Lupkeret al., 1997).The co-occurrenceof a base-word fre-
quency effect with a pseudohomophone disadvantage
suggests that the pseudohomophone disadvantage would
better serve as a coarse-grained measure of phonological
lexical/semantic access underpure-blockpresentationcon-
ditions, in contrast to the pseudohomophone advantage
that has been observed in the mixed-blockconditionshere
and by previous researchers. It is clear that the pseudo-
homophone naming advantage can no longer be assumed
to simply represent a coarse-grained effect of base-word
frequency (e.g., Seidenberg et al., 1996).
Kinoshita, S. (2001, November). Filler type effects in naming: Control
of pathways or time criterion? Paper presented at the annual meeting
of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
KucÏera,H., & Francis, W. N. (1967).Computationalanalysisof present-
day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection procedures
in mental addition:Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Jour-
nal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory, & Cognition, 22,
216-230.
REFERENCES
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about
print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good
measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected
decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Percep-
tion & Performance, 10, 340-357.
Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence
for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading.
Journalof Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory, & Cognition,
17, 644-652.
Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated
measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149-157.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Similar attentional, frequency,
and associative effects for pseudohomophonesand words. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19,
166-178.
Besner, D. (1999). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in lo-
calist and connectionist models. In R. M. Klein and P. A. McMullen
(Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a
naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? Journal of Ex-
perimental Psychology:Learning,Memory, & Cognition, 23, 570-590.
Marmurek, H. H. C., & Kwantes, P. J. (1996). Reading words and
wirds: Phonology and lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology, 49A, 696-714.
McCann, R. S., & Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones:
Implications for models of pronunciation and the locus of word-
frequency effects in word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 14-24.
McCann, R. [S.], Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1988). Word recogni-
tion and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical ac-
cess? Journalof Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Per-
formance, 13, 693-706.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive acti-
vation model of contexteffects in letter perception:Part 1. An account
of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., & Mil-
roy,R. (1992).Lexical and sublexical translation of spellingto sound:
Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 452-467.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psy-
chological Review, 76, 165-178.
Owen, W. J., & Borowsky, R. (2002). Evaluating the relationship be-
tween phoneticdecoding and sightvocabulary:Evidence for single or
dual routes? Manuscript under review.
Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt,R. W., & Noel, R. W.
(1987). Frequency and pronounceabilityin visually presented naming
and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and per-
formance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221-243). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Borowsky,R., & Besner, D. (1993).Visual word recognition:A multi-
stage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn-
ing, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 813-840.
Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996a, November). Frequency ef-
fects in word and pseudohomophonenaming.Poster session presented
at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996b). Semantic ambiguity ef-
fects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 63-85.
Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1999). Frequency effects and lexi-
cal access: On the interpretation of null pseudohomophonebase-word
frequency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Per-
ception & Performance, 25, 270-275.
Borowsky, R., McDougall, P., MacKinnon, G. E., & Hymel, S.
(2002). On the diagnosisof surface and phonologicaldyslexias: Mea-
suring reliance on sight vocabulary and phonetic decoding during
real word recognition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Borowsky, R., Owen, W. J., & Fonos, N. (1999). Reading speech and
hearing print: Constraining models of visual word recognition by ex-
ploringconnections with speech perception. CanadianJournal of Ex-
perimental Psychology, 53, 294-305.
Coltheart, M. (2000, November). Strategic processing in reading
aloud: Implications for computational models of reading. Paper pre-
sented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New
Orleans.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Mod-
els of reading: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing ap-
proaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977).
Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and per-
formance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Plaut,D. C., McClelland, J. L.,Seidenberg,M. S., & Patterson,K. E.
(1996). Understandingnormal and impaired word reading: Computa-
tional principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review,
103, 56-115.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. L. (1977).
Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Ex-
perimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1-17.
Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed develop-
mental model of word recognitionand naming. Psychological Review,
96, 523-568.
Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming
time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2001).
Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in
reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory &
Language, 45, 648-664.
Grainger,J., Spinelli,E., & Ferrand,L. (2000). Effects of base-word
frequency and orthographicneighborhoodsize in pseudohomophone
naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 88-102.
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acqui-