Assessment of the efficacy of SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) filtration of bovine spermatozoa for cryopreservation
-
Add time:07/17/2019 Source:sciencedirect.com
Semen from five dairy AI bulls was split-filtered through a SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) filter and frozen in a Tris–citric acid buffer egg yolk-based extender. The effect of filtration was studied morphologically for individual sperm abnormalities. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) was used for motility and sperm motion assessment. Flow cytometry was used to disclose sperm viability (SYBR-14/PI), mitochondrial membrane potential (Mitotracker Deep Red/SYBR 14), acrosome integrity (SYBR 14/PE-PNA/PI), plasma membrane stability (Merocyanine 540/YO-PRO 1/Hoechst 333342), and chromatin stability (acridine orange staining). Filtration significantly reduced the concentration of recovered spermatozoa (P<0.01), but improved semen quality, reducing the number of spermatozoa with various forms of morphological defects. Filtration also affected percentages of sperm motility after equilibration and after freezing/thawing. Sperm motion characteristics were, however, not significantly affected by filtration at any stage of the cryopreservation protocol, including post-extension, equilibration, or freezing/thawing. Filtration enhanced sperm viability after thawing (P<0.05), but had no significant effect (P>0.05) on recovery of spermatozoa with high mitochondrial potential, intact acrosomes, or preserved sperm chromatin structure. Sperm plasma membrane stability was also not affected by the filtration method used (P>0.05). It can be concluded that filtration effectively separates weaken or abnormal spermatozoa in pre-freezing semen samples and therefore the procedure could be recommended to improve post-thaw sperm viability of selected, fertile sires.
We also recommend Trading Suppliers and Manufacturers of SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6). Pls Click Website Link as below: cas 11081-40-6 suppliers
Prev:Measurement of molecular weight distribution of humic substances with untreated SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) and ammonia-treated SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6)
Next:Differential elution of sodium or potassium dihydrogen- and hydrogenphosphate ions from a SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) column with sodium or potassium chloride solution) - 【Back】【Close 】【Print】【Add to favorite 】
- Related Information
- Chromatographic behaviour of inorganic anions on a SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) column07/24/2019
- Differential elution from a SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) column of sodium and phosphate ions of sodium phosphate with sodium or potassium phosphate buffer07/23/2019
- Potassium and sodium chloride ion pairs are presumed to constitute a complex during elution from a SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) column with sodium phosphate buffer07/22/2019
- Sephadex filtration as successful alternative to density-gradient centrifugation procedures for ram sperm selection with improved kinetics07/20/2019
- Partitioning of oligoglucans in SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) in relation to their conformational structure07/21/2019
- Stereoselectivity in the elution of sugars from columns of SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6)07/19/2019
- Differential elution of sodium or potassium dihydrogen- and hydrogenphosphate ions from a SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) column with sodium or potassium chloride solution07/18/2019
- Measurement of molecular weight distribution of humic substances with untreated SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6) and ammonia-treated SEPHADEX G-15 (cas 11081-40-6)07/16/2019