1736
J. Lu et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2010) 1731–1738
ion trap MS (Agilent) for low molecular weight prodrugs
MW < 2000) and 4800 plus MALDI-TOF/TOF (ABI) for high
mixture was stirred overnight and pH was adjusted to 3–4 with 3 M
hydrochloride solution. Then the reaction mixture was extracted
with methylene dichloride (three times, 50 mL each time) and the
solvent was removed under vacuum. The crude product was
precipitated from this solution after 300 mL ether was added
dropwise with rapid stirring. The precipitate was filtered and
washed several times with ether. The product was crystallized from
ethanol, filtered, washed, and dried under vacuum. The yields of 4a,
4b, 4c, 4d and 4e were 97.6%, 88.5%, 80.8%, 78.9% and 70.2%,
respectively [27].
(
molecular weight prodrugs (MW ꢃ 2000).
The post-processing method of product: the reaction mixture
was filtered. The mixture of acetic acid and tetrahydrofuran (mass
ratio ¼ 1:9) were added into the filtrate with stirring for 2 h and
then ether was added into the mixture. The precipitate was filtered
and purified by silica gel column chromatography (CH
CH
OH ¼ 10:1). Finally, the product was crystallized three times
from ethanol and dried under vacuum.
2 2
Cl /
3
All final products had a purity of ꢃ98%. The purity of final
products was determined by HPLC (Aglient 1200)-UV-ELSD (Alltech
5.1.4.3. Synthesis of amino PEG (6a–e). 3 (0.205 mol) and 4
5
(
00).
4.6 mm ꢄ 250 mm, 5
with 0.1% TFA, 0–5 min, 80% B; 5–15 min, 80%/60% B; 15–25 min,
Method:
Phenomenex
Gemini
C18
column
(0.020 mol) were stirred in 100 mL DMF in a nitrogen atmo-
sphere at 120 C for 4 h. The precipitate was filtered off and
dissolved in 200 mL ethanol, and then 10 mL hydrazine hydrate
was added. The mixture was heated under reflux for 4 h. After
cooling down to room temperature, the product was precipitated
by adding dropwise ether to the solution. The precipitate was
ꢁ
mm); mobile phase: A ¼ acetonitrile, B ¼ H
2
O
6
0% B; 26–30 min, 80% B; flow rate ¼ 0.6 mL/min;
l
¼ 334 nm; run
ꢁ
time ¼ 30 min; ELSD: drift tube temperature: 110 C; gas flow:
3
.0 L/min.
Reversed-phase HPLC was performed with L-2130 pump and
2 2
filtered and re-dissolved in 30 mL CH Cl , and the insoluble
L-2400 UV detector system (HITACHI, Japan). A binary isocratic
mobile phase composed of a mixture of 0.3% of formic acid in water
and acetonitrile was used on a Phenomenex RP-18C column
impurities were removed by filtration. The filtrate was concen-
trated and ether was slowly added. The precipitate was filtered,
washed, and dried in vacuum to give 6. The yields of the products
6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, and 6e were 93.5%, 86.7%, 81.6%, 77.4% and 69.3%,
respectively [27].
(
250 ꢄ 4.60 mm, 5
mm). The detection wavelength was 334 nm and
the flow rate was 0.8 mL/min. This HPLC method was used to
measure the plasma concentration of drugs in Pharmacokinetic
study.
5.1.4.4. Synthesis of scutellarin-PEG amide (7a–e). Scutellarin
(
0.01 mol) was dissolved in 60 mL of anhydrous DMF, and to this
0
0
5
.1.3. Synthesis of scutellarin-6 -PEG esters (2a–e)
solution were added 6 (0.012 mol), HOBT (0.015 mmol) and DCC
(0.015 mol). The resulting solution was stirred at 40 C for an
ꢁ
Scutellarin (0.010 mol) was dissolved in 60 mL of anhydrous
DMF, and to this solution were added mPEG (0.012 mol), HOBT
appropriate time under nitrogen. The progress of the reaction was
monitored by TLC. The post-processing method was mentioned as
‘‘2.2. General methods’’. The yields of 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d and 7e were
80.3%, 75.4%, 67.5%, 58.0% and 39.8%, respectively.
(
0.015 mol) and DCC (0.015 mol). The resulting solution was stirred
ꢁ
at 40 C for an appropriate time under nitrogen. The progress of the
reaction was monitored by TLC. The post-processing method was
mentioned as ‘‘2.2. General methods’’. The yields of 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d,
13
1
The C and H NMR of 7c (7a, 7b, 7d and 7e are almost the same
1
2
e were 76.3%, 65.4%, 58.7%, 53.2% and 47.4%, respectively.
as 7c) were as follows: H NMR (DMSO-d
(s, 1H, C –OH), 8.58 (s, 1H, C –OH), 7.96, 7.94 (d, 2H, C
(s, H, C –H), 6.95–6.92 (d, 2H, C –H), 6.83 (s, 1H, C –H), 5.08–5.06
(s,1H, C ), 3.51–
00–H), 3.98–3.95 (d, 1H, C 00–H), 3.73 (t, 2H, –COOCH
3.17 (–OCH CH ), 3.24 (s, 3H, –OCH ). C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d
58.09, 68.08, 69.63–69.82, 71.33, 72.79, 75.62, 75.30, 93.88,
6
, 300MHz):
d
H
10.37
0 0
–H), 6.98
2 , 6
13
1
The C and H NMR chemical shift values of 2a (2b, 2c, 2d and
4
0
5
1
2
e are almost the same as 2a) were as follows: H NMR (DMSO-d
6
,
3
3
0
,5
0
8
3
00 MHz):
d
H
10.36 (s, 1H, C
4
0
–OH), 8.60 (s, 1H, C
–H), 6.96–6.93 (d, 2H, C
00–H), 4.22–4.19 (d,1H, C
), 3.51–3.24 (–OCH CH ), 3.17 (s, 3H, –OCH
): 53.82, 68.55, 69.27–70.02, 71.21, 73.18,
6.20, 76.42, 93.92, 100.78, 101.57, 102.48, 116.03,116.03, 121.45,
28.69, 130.76, 146.92, 149.09, 151.05, 161.18, 164.15, 169.21, 182.42.
a: 287.2, 749.4, 793.4, 837.4, 881.4, 925.4, 969.4,1013.4,1057.3; The
mass spectrum data: 2b: 961.7,1005.7,1049.6,1093.5,1137.5,1181.4,
225.4, 1269.3; 2c: 1399.7, 1443.7, 1487.7, 1531.7, 1575.8, 1619.8,
663.8, 1707.8, 1751.8; 2d: 2280.0, 2324.0, 2368.0, 2412.1, 2456.0,
5
–OH), 7.95, 7.92
–H), 6.82
00–H), 3.68
1
5
2
13
(d, 2H, C
(s, 1H, C
(s, 2H, –COOCH
2
0
, 6
0
–H), 7.00 (s, H, C
3
3
0
,5
0
2
2
3
6
)
8
–H), 5.30–5.26 (s, 1H, C
1
5
d
13
2
2
2
3
).
C
100.65, 102.55, 105.99, 116.06, 116.06, 121.31, 128.52, 128.52, 130.58,
146.85, 149.06, 151.07, 161.32, 164.16, 168.14, 182.42. The mass
spectrum data: 7a: 768.6, 812.7, 856.6, 900.3, 944.2, 988.1, 1031.9,
1075.8,1119.8; 7b: 826.3, 870.4, 914.4, 958.4, 1002.4, 1046.5, 1090.5,
1134.5; 7c: 1252.5, 1296.5, 1340.5, 1384.5, 1428.6, 1472.6, 1516.7,
1560.7; 7d: 1618.8, 1662.8, 1706.8, 1750.9, 1794.9, 1838.9, 1882.9,
1926.9, 19709.9; 7e: 2391.3, 2435.4, 2479.4, 2523.4, 2567.5, 2611.5,
2655.5, 2699.5, 2743.6. The highest peak of the normal distribu-
tions of 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d and 7e were 944.2, 1002.4, 1428.6, 1794.9 and
2567.5, respectively.
NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d
7
1
2
6
d
1
1
2
3
500.0, 2544.0; 2e: 3100.0, 3144.2, 3188.2, 3232.4, 3276.5, 3320.7,
364.6, 3408.5, 3452.7. The highest peak of the normal distribu-
tions of 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d and 2e were 881.4, 1093.5, 1575.8, 2412.1 and
0
3
276.5, respectively.
5.1.5. Synthesis of scutellarin-4 -PEG-succinate esters (10a–e)
5.1.5.1. Synthesis of mPEG-succinate (8a–e). mPEG (100 mmol) was
5
5
.1.4. Synthesis of scutellarin-PEG amide (7a–e)
.1.4.1. Synthesis of potassium phthalimide (3). To a stirred solution
dissolved in 250 mL chloroform and to this resulting solution was
added succinic anhydride (125 mmol) and 10 mL pyridine. Then the
reaction mixture was refluxed for 48 h with stirring. After evapo-
ration of the reaction mixture to dryness, the residue was dissolved
in saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, filtered and then
extracted with ethyl acetate (twice, 200 mL each). Aqueous phase
of phthalimide (100 g, 0.68 mol) in 600 mL ethanol, was added
dropwise 1200 mL of a potassium hydroxide solution in methanol
(
80 g/L), and the stirring was continued for another 4 h at room
temperature. The reaction mixture was filtered. The filter cake was
washed three times with ethanol, and then evaporated under
reduced pressure to yield a white solid (122.02 g, 97.0%).
ꢁ
was cooled to 0 C and the pH was adjusted to 2.0 with 2 M
hydrochloric acid, and then extracted with methylene chloride
(
3 ꢄ 200 mL). The methylene chloride solution was dried over
5
.1.4.2. Synthesis of PEG-tosylate (4a–e). 0.01 mol mPEG was dis-
solved in methylene dichloride, followed by the addition of
.40 mol p-Toluenesulfonyl chloride and 5 mL pyridine. The
magnesium sulfate and then evaporated to dryness. The yields of
8a, 8b, 8c, 8d and 8e were 98.5%, 90.8%, 86.0%, 80.4% and 75.9%,
respectively.
0